Topical Map

See your site the way Google groups it: which pages compete for the same meaning, which topics are too thin to rank, and which pages should link but don't — the level a per-page audit can't see.

Pages come from your sitemap.xml — service and category pages first, then blog; cart, login and legal are skipped. No sitemap, no map.
Cost: 25 credits for this depth

Find pages fighting each other

Two pages built for the same meaning split your rankings between them. See every cannibalization pair on your site, so you know what to merge and what to keep apart.

Links you're missing

A guide and a listing on the same topic should point to each other. Spot the internal links that belong but aren't there — and the strong pages your own site isn't passing authority to.

Thin topics, held up

Topics carried by a single shallow page never build authority. See where coverage is too thin to compete, so you know exactly where to add depth next.

What we don't do

×Don't tell you to merge a guide into a listing

Cannibalization is only flagged between pages of the same kind. A guide and a service page close in meaning is a link suggestion, not a merge — they serve different intents and should point at each other.

×Don't use fixed thresholds or an LLM

"Too close" on a 20-page niche site and on a 200-page store are different numbers, so every threshold is calibrated on this run and shown in the report. No language model is involved — every figure comes from the embeddings.

×Don't promise "move 15% of the weight"

Internal PageRank is a model, not a fact Google shares. We list the pages your own site starves of links and the donors that could feed them — a list, not percentages.

×Don't see rankings or traffic

Pages come from your sitemap and are read as text. A "thin" topic is thin in content, not necessarily in demand — check it against your Search Console before you invest in it.